<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case For Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dunae.ca/2009/the-case-for-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dunae.ca/2009/the-case-for-code/</link>
	<description>Marketer. Coder. Enthusiast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:33:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pro Newb</title>
		<link>http://dunae.ca/2009/the-case-for-code/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro Newb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dunae.ca/?p=140#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Emphasize the collaboration part - it&#039;s the back bone of any project!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emphasize the collaboration part &#8211; it&#8217;s the back bone of any project!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Thursby</title>
		<link>http://dunae.ca/2009/the-case-for-code/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Thursby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dunae.ca/?p=140#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Hey Alex,

Thanks for reading my article, and posting a follow up with your own thoughts =)

I should mention that I didn’t mean “screw code” as a call to disregard code when visually designing a website; I meant “screw code” as a call to disregard any limitations of code, perceived or real.

I posted a follow-up post which hopefully cleared things up a bit after my initial rant, I hope you&#039;ll check it out =)

http://sthursby.com/thoughts/2009/12/the-case-against-code-ii/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Alex,</p>
<p>Thanks for reading my article, and posting a follow up with your own thoughts =)</p>
<p>I should mention that I didn’t mean “screw code” as a call to disregard code when visually designing a website; I meant “screw code” as a call to disregard any limitations of code, perceived or real.</p>
<p>I posted a follow-up post which hopefully cleared things up a bit after my initial rant, I hope you&#8217;ll check it out =)</p>
<p><a href="http://sthursby.com/thoughts/2009/12/the-case-against-code-ii/" rel="nofollow">http://sthursby.com/thoughts/2009/12/the-case-against-code-ii/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://dunae.ca/2009/the-case-for-code/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dunae.ca/?p=140#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Precisely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Precisely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://dunae.ca/2009/the-case-for-code/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dunae.ca/?p=140#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I believe knowing code removes constraints and presents new ideas to the designer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe knowing code removes constraints and presents new ideas to the designer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
